The model weight is only the useful material. A P1S and AMS job can also consume support, color-change flushing and a prime tower, and those grams still leave the spool. This guide builds a quote from the slicer's categories without pretending that a modeled example is a measured production record.

Editorial diagram separating a printed model, removable supports, purge waste and a prime tower on a build plate
Editorial illustration — not a measured test photograph.Separate useful model material from process material before assigning filament cost.

1. Record four material buckets instead of one total

After slicing, record the useful model grams, support grams, flushing grams and prime-tower grams as separate fields. Model material creates the deliverable. Supports may be necessary for geometry but are removed. Flush material manages a transition, while the prime tower helps stabilize extrusion around tool changes. All are direct material consumption, but separating them shows which design or profile change can actually reduce cost.

Use the same project file, filament profiles and build-plate arrangement that will be produced. A draft slice with different colors or quantities is not a reliable quote. Save the slicer version and profile name with the job because software and profile changes can alter estimates.

  • Save the 3MF or project revision used for the quote.
  • Record each material category and total grams.
  • Record spool price by material and color when they differ.
  • Keep estimated values separate from scale measurements.

2. Convert each category with the price of the spool that supplies it

Convert spool price to price per gram, then multiply each category by its relevant rate. If support interface or color changes use different materials, calculate those lines separately rather than applying one blended price. Add shipping only when it is consistently part of acquisition cost, and do not silently treat a nominal one-kilogram spool as one kilogram of usable filament if your process reserves an unusable remainder.

A transparent quote can show useful material and process material as two subtotals. That makes a multicolor premium defensible: the customer pays for a production method, not only for the grams remaining in the part.

Material cost = Σ(category grams × that filament's landed price per gram)

3. Worked example: keep assumptions visible

Suppose a slice reports 120 g of model, 18 g of support, 42 g of flushing and 10 g of prime tower. At an assumed landed rate of $0.025/g, the modeled material consumption is 190 g and the modeled material cost is $4.75. Useful model material accounts for $3.00; the other $1.75 is process material.

This is an arithmetic example, not a P1S measurement or a promise of typical AMS waste. Replace every number with the current Bambu Studio result. The comparison becomes useful when the same model is sliced again after changing orientation, color order, objects per plate or validated flushing settings.

CategoryExample gramsExample cost
Model120 g$3.00
Supports18 g$0.45
Flush + tower52 g$1.30

4. Price accepted output, not only one successful slice

The slicer predicts one planned build. Commercial cost must also cover failed starts, rejected surfaces and unusable color transitions. Apply a documented expected-yield factor to the full job cost, or use a rolling accepted-output record. Do not multiply individual waste categories by failure and then apply the same failure factor again to the total.

Machine time, operator work and electricity remain separate cost lines. A lower filament estimate can still be a worse business decision if it adds hours, difficult support removal or a higher rejection rate.

Expected material cost per accepted job = planned material cost ÷ expected acceptance rate

5. Reduce waste by comparing controlled slices

Bambu Studio calculates flushing volume from transition conditions, and Bambu Lab documents controls intended to reduce filament-change waste. Test only documented settings and inspect the result for color contamination or material incompatibility. A failed product costs more than the few grams saved by an aggressive, unvalidated reduction.

Compare object count per plate, color sequence, orientation, support strategy and whether a prime tower is required for the selected workflow. Save before-and-after totals and choose on accepted cost per part—not the smallest orange waste number in isolation.

Related guides

References and further reading

These manufacturer and technical references support the workflow described above. Use them as a starting point, then validate costs and settings in your own workshop.

Calculate multicolor waste and added cost

Open calculator →